Yatırımcı.AI

ANE vs AVD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ANE (Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Karma Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and AVD (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Karma Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

ANEAVD
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ANE vs AVD Fund Comparison
MetricANEAVDCategory median
Daily−0.85%−1.54%−0.85%
1 week−0.73%−1.39%−0.48%
1 month−2.26%−4.96%−1.96%
3 months−1.87%−0.14%1.89%
6 months1.91%−1.98%8.31%
YTD16.71%16.42%19.33%
1 year25.13%22.61%24.17%
3 years128.29%153.90%177.07%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ANE vs AVD Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ANE (Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Karma Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and AVD (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Karma Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, ANE leads in 7 and AVD leads in 4. ANE is a Mixed Fund fund managed by Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; AVD is a Mixed Fund fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ANE leads (−0.85% vs −1.54%). 1 week: ANE leads (−0.73% vs −1.39%). 1 month: ANE leads (−2.26% vs −4.96%). 3 months: AVD leads (−0.14% vs −1.87%). 6 months: ANE leads (1.91% vs −1.98%). YTD: ANE leads (16.71% vs 16.42%). 1 year: ANE leads (25.13% vs 22.61%). 3 years: AVD leads (153.90% vs 128.29%). Size (TRY): AVD leads (2.4B vs 110M). Investors: AVD leads (30,145 vs 22,179). Risk: ANE leads (4 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ANE returned 16.71% and AVD returned 16.42%; over the last year ANE returned 25.13% and AVD returned 22.61%. Over the last month ANE returned −2.26% and AVD returned −4.96%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, ANE has a size of TRY 110M with 22,179 investors, while AVD has a size of TRY 2.4B with 30,145 investors. AVD leads in size and AVD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ANE is 4 out of 7 and that of AVD is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.