Yatırımcı.AI

AJK vs GRL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AJK (Ak Portföy 0-5 Yıl Vadeli Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and GRL (QNB Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) side by side.

AJKGRL
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

AJK vs GRL Fund Comparison
MetricAJKGRLCategory median
Daily0.20%−0.15%0.16%
1 week0.53%1.13%0.46%
1 month2.28%−0.09%1.10%
3 months5.93%2.55%3.53%
6 months12.14%1.73%8.53%
YTD19.21%17.43%16.18%
1 year22.96%27.38%19.94%
3 years82.49%17.37%103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the AJK vs GRL Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AJK (Ak Portföy 0-5 Yıl Vadeli Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and GRL (QNB Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AJK leads in 7 and GRL leads in 3. AJK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GRL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: AJK leads (0.20% vs −0.15%). 1 week: GRL leads (1.13% vs 0.53%). 1 month: AJK leads (2.28% vs −0.09%). 3 months: AJK leads (5.93% vs 2.55%). 6 months: AJK leads (12.14% vs 1.73%). YTD: AJK leads (19.21% vs 17.43%). 1 year: GRL leads (27.38% vs 22.96%). 3 years: AJK leads (82.49% vs 17.37%). Size (TRY): AJK leads (140.2M vs 135.7M). Investors: GRL leads (233 vs 130).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date AJK returned 19.21% and GRL returned 17.43%; over the last year AJK returned 22.96% and GRL returned 27.38%. Over the last month AJK returned 2.28% and GRL returned −0.09%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, AJK has a size of TRY 140.2M with 130 investors, while GRL has a size of TRY 135.7M with 233 investors. AJK leads in size and GRL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AJK is — out of 7 and that of GRL is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.