CIMSA vs KUTPO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of CIMSA and KUTPO side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CIMSA | KUTPO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 39.64 | 56.35 | 12.14 |
| Daily change | 1.75% | 0.18% | −0.79% |
| Market cap | TRY 37.5B | TRY 2.2B | TRY 4.3B |
| P/E | 7.82 | — | 27.67 |
| P/B | 0.90 | 0.60 | 0.70 |
| Dividend yield | 1.50% | 2.07% | 2.07% |
| Return on equity | 11.48% | −0.73% | 0.58% |
| Free float | 36.09% | 25.48% | 26.66% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CIMSA vs KUTPO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of CIMSA (Cimsa) and KUTPO (Kutahya Porselen) side by side as of Nov 2, 2026, 18:19. Of the 16 metrics compared, CIMSA leads in 5 and KUTPO leads in 11.
Highlights: Daily change: CIMSA leads (1.75% vs 0.18%). Market cap: CIMSA leads (TRY 37.5B vs TRY 2.2B). P/B: KUTPO leads (0.60 vs 0.90). EV/EBITDA: KUTPO leads (4.40 vs 7.68). EV/Sales: KUTPO leads (1.32 vs 1.50). Dividend yield: KUTPO leads (2.07% vs 1.50%). Gross margin: KUTPO leads (31.44% vs 18.77%). EBITDA margin (annual): KUTPO leads (22.68% vs 18.39%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CIMSA or KUTPO cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (7.82 vs —); by P/B, KUTPO trades at the lower multiple (0.90 vs 0.60).
Which is more profitable, CIMSA or KUTPO?
Annual net margin is 10.52% for CIMSA and −0.82% for KUTPO; return on equity is 11.48% for CIMSA and −0.73% for KUTPO.
Which is more leveraged, CIMSA or KUTPO?
The leverage ratio is 51.68 for CIMSA and 18.09 for KUTPO; net debt/EBITDA is 3.14 for CIMSA and −0.11 for KUTPO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.