Yatırımcı.AI

ZDD vs ZDZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ZDD (Ziraat Portföy Temkinli Değişken Fon) and ZDZ (Ziraat Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) side by side.

ZDDZDZ
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ZDD vs ZDZ Fund Comparison
MetricZDDZDZCategory median
Daily−0.38%−5.38%−1.41%
1 week−0.01%−8.13%−0.69%
1 month0.19%−21.69%−3.96%
3 months5.16%−35.03%−1.43%
6 months11.48%−36.26%1.85%
YTD25.26%−30.80%17.97%
1 year33.18%−35.96%23.69%
3 years197.08%19.05%149.99%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ZDD vs ZDZ Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ZDD (Ziraat Portföy Temkinli Değişken Fon) and ZDZ (Ziraat Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, ZDD leads in 9 and ZDZ leads in 2. ZDD is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZDZ is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ZDD leads (−0.38% vs −5.38%). 1 week: ZDD leads (−0.01% vs −8.13%). 1 month: ZDD leads (0.19% vs −21.69%). 3 months: ZDD leads (5.16% vs −35.03%). 6 months: ZDD leads (11.48% vs −36.26%). YTD: ZDD leads (25.26% vs −30.80%). 1 year: ZDD leads (33.18% vs −35.96%). 3 years: ZDD leads (197.08% vs 19.05%). Size (TRY): ZDZ leads (593.9M vs 519M). Investors: ZDZ leads (7,834 vs 1,350). Risk: ZDD leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ZDD returned 25.26% and ZDZ returned −30.80%; over the last year ZDD returned 33.18% and ZDZ returned −35.96%. Over the last month ZDD returned 0.19% and ZDZ returned −21.69%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, ZDD has a size of TRY 519M with 1,350 investors, while ZDZ has a size of TRY 593.9M with 7,834 investors. ZDZ leads in size and ZDZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ZDD is 4 out of 7 and that of ZDZ is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.