SVB vs TSZ Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of SVB (Strateji Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) and TSZ (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Taşınmaz ve İnşaat Sektörü Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | SVB | TSZ | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | 1.28% | — | 1.31% |
| Daily | −2.46% | −0.13% | −1.41% |
| 1 week | −1.63% | 0.47% | −0.69% |
| 1 month | −9.49% | −1.08% | −3.96% |
| 3 months | −13.38% | −9.22% | −1.43% |
| 6 months | −13.00% | −9.05% | 1.85% |
| YTD | −1.80% | 4.49% | 17.97% |
| 1 year | 0.27% | 5.31% | 23.69% |
| 3 years | 126.32% | — | 149.99% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the SVB vs TSZ Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of SVB (Strateji Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) and TSZ (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Taşınmaz ve İnşaat Sektörü Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, SVB leads in 0 and TSZ leads in 9. SVB is a Variable Fund fund managed by Strateji Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TSZ is a Variable Fund fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: TSZ leads (−0.13% vs −2.46%). 1 week: TSZ leads (0.47% vs −1.63%). 1 month: TSZ leads (−1.08% vs −9.49%). 3 months: TSZ leads (−9.22% vs −13.38%). 6 months: TSZ leads (−9.05% vs −13.00%). YTD: TSZ leads (4.49% vs −1.80%). 1 year: TSZ leads (5.31% vs 0.27%). Size (TRY): TSZ leads (158.6M vs 156.2M). Investors: TSZ leads (5,651 vs 1,046).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, SVB or TSZ?
Year to date SVB returned −1.80% and TSZ returned 4.49%; over the last year SVB returned 0.27% and TSZ returned 5.31%. Over the last month SVB returned −9.49% and TSZ returned −1.08%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, SVB or TSZ?
As of November 2, 2026, SVB has a size of TRY 156.2M with 1,046 investors, while TSZ has a size of TRY 158.6M with 5,651 investors. TSZ leads in size and TSZ leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of SVB and TSZ mean?
The CMB risk score of SVB is 5 out of 7 and that of TSZ is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.