SUC vs ZDZ Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of SUC (Ünlü Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) and ZDZ (Ziraat Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | SUC | ZDZ | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −2.59% | −5.38% | −1.41% |
| 1 week | −0.87% | −8.13% | −0.69% |
| 1 month | −4.29% | −21.69% | −3.96% |
| 3 months | 2.67% | −35.03% | −1.43% |
| 6 months | 9.81% | −36.26% | 1.85% |
| YTD | 23.05% | −30.80% | 17.97% |
| 1 year | 28.98% | −35.96% | 23.69% |
| 3 years | 198.48% | 19.05% | 149.99% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the SUC vs ZDZ Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of SUC (Ünlü Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) and ZDZ (Ziraat Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, SUC leads in 8 and ZDZ leads in 2. SUC is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ünlü Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZDZ is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: SUC leads (−2.59% vs −5.38%). 1 week: SUC leads (−0.87% vs −8.13%). 1 month: SUC leads (−4.29% vs −21.69%). 3 months: SUC leads (2.67% vs −35.03%). 6 months: SUC leads (9.81% vs −36.26%). YTD: SUC leads (23.05% vs −30.80%). 1 year: SUC leads (28.98% vs −35.96%). 3 years: SUC leads (198.48% vs 19.05%). Size (TRY): ZDZ leads (593.9M vs 555.4M). Investors: ZDZ leads (7,834 vs 410).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, SUC or ZDZ?
Year to date SUC returned 23.05% and ZDZ returned −30.80%; over the last year SUC returned 28.98% and ZDZ returned −35.96%. Over the last month SUC returned −4.29% and ZDZ returned −21.69%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, SUC or ZDZ?
As of November 2, 2026, SUC has a size of TRY 555.4M with 410 investors, while ZDZ has a size of TRY 593.9M with 7,834 investors. ZDZ leads in size and ZDZ leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of SUC and ZDZ mean?
The CMB risk score of SUC is 6 out of 7 and that of ZDZ is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.