Yatırımcı.AI

SUC vs ZDD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of SUC (Ünlü Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) and ZDD (Ziraat Portföy Temkinli Değişken Fon) side by side.

SUCZDD
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

SUC vs ZDD Fund Comparison
MetricSUCZDDCategory median
Daily−2.59%−0.38%−1.41%
1 week−0.87%−0.01%−0.69%
1 month−4.29%0.19%−3.96%
3 months2.67%5.16%−1.43%
6 months9.81%11.48%1.85%
YTD23.05%25.26%17.97%
1 year28.98%33.18%23.69%
3 years198.48%197.08%149.99%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the SUC vs ZDD Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of SUC (Ünlü Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) and ZDD (Ziraat Portföy Temkinli Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, SUC leads in 2 and ZDD leads in 9. SUC is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ünlü Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZDD is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ZDD leads (−0.38% vs −2.59%). 1 week: ZDD leads (−0.01% vs −0.87%). 1 month: ZDD leads (0.19% vs −4.29%). 3 months: ZDD leads (5.16% vs 2.67%). 6 months: ZDD leads (11.48% vs 9.81%). YTD: ZDD leads (25.26% vs 23.05%). 1 year: ZDD leads (33.18% vs 28.98%). 3 years: SUC leads (198.48% vs 197.08%). Size (TRY): SUC leads (555.4M vs 519M). Investors: ZDD leads (1,350 vs 410). Risk: ZDD leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date SUC returned 23.05% and ZDD returned 25.26%; over the last year SUC returned 28.98% and ZDD returned 33.18%. Over the last month SUC returned −4.29% and ZDD returned 0.19%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, SUC has a size of TRY 555.4M with 410 investors, while ZDD has a size of TRY 519M with 1,350 investors. SUC leads in size and ZDD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of SUC is 6 out of 7 and that of ZDD is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.