Yatırımcı.AI

NKP vs TAR Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NKP (Neo Portföy Kar Payı Ödeyen Değişken Fon) and TAR (Ak Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.

NKPTAR
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

NKP vs TAR Fund Comparison
MetricNKPTARCategory median
Daily−2.59%−0.15%−1.41%
1 week−0.80%−0.92%−0.69%
1 month−7.15%−1.44%−3.96%
3 months−4.51%−7.37%−1.43%
6 months−9.98%3.92%1.85%
YTD−1.85%11.93%17.97%
1 year1.62%16.84%23.69%
3 years—64.80%149.99%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the NKP vs TAR Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of NKP (Neo Portföy Kar Payı Ödeyen Değişken Fon) and TAR (Ak Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, NKP leads in 2 and TAR leads in 7. NKP is a Variable Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TAR is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: TAR leads (−0.15% vs −2.59%). 1 week: NKP leads (−0.80% vs −0.92%). 1 month: TAR leads (−1.44% vs −7.15%). 3 months: NKP leads (−4.51% vs −7.37%). 6 months: TAR leads (3.92% vs −9.98%). YTD: TAR leads (11.93% vs −1.85%). 1 year: TAR leads (16.84% vs 1.62%). Size (TRY): TAR leads (119.7M vs 112.3M). Investors: TAR leads (6,198 vs 2,480).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date NKP returned −1.85% and TAR returned 11.93%; over the last year NKP returned 1.62% and TAR returned 16.84%. Over the last month NKP returned −7.15% and TAR returned −1.44%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, NKP has a size of TRY 112.3M with 2,480 investors, while TAR has a size of TRY 119.7M with 6,198 investors. TAR leads in size and TAR leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of NKP is 5 out of 7 and that of TAR is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.