Yatırımcı.AI

IRF vs PIL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IRF (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and PIL (Rota Portföy Pil Teknolojileri ve Enerji Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

IRFPIL
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IRF vs PIL Fund Comparison
MetricIRFPILCategory median
Daily−0.00%−2.68%−1.33%
1 week0.41%−0.44%−0.68%
1 month−15.48%−7.58%−2.96%
3 months−10.71%−7.15%0.00%
6 months1.86%−12.44%2.05%
YTD18.07%10.83%17.79%
1 year25.18%26.27%24.45%
3 years163.82%186.34%158.82%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IRF vs PIL Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IRF (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and PIL (Rota Portföy Pil Teknolojileri ve Enerji Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, IRF leads in 6 and PIL leads in 5. IRF is a Fund of Funds fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PIL is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IRF leads (0.00% vs −2.68%). 1 week: IRF leads (0.41% vs −0.44%). 1 month: PIL leads (−7.58% vs −15.48%). 3 months: PIL leads (−7.15% vs −10.71%). 6 months: IRF leads (1.86% vs −12.44%). YTD: IRF leads (18.07% vs 10.83%). 1 year: PIL leads (26.27% vs 25.18%). 3 years: PIL leads (186.34% vs 163.82%). Size (TRY): IRF leads (276.9M vs 254.7M). Investors: PIL leads (5,505 vs 1,253). Risk: IRF leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IRF returned 18.07% and PIL returned 10.83%; over the last year IRF returned 25.18% and PIL returned 26.27%. Over the last month IRF returned −15.48% and PIL returned −7.58%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, IRF has a size of TRY 276.9M with 1,253 investors, while PIL has a size of TRY 254.7M with 5,505 investors. IRF leads in size and PIL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IRF is 4 out of 7 and that of PIL is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.