Yatırımcı.AI

IPG vs TJI Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IPG (İş Portföy Atak Fon Sepeti Fonu) and TJI (TEB Portföy İkinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

IPGTJI
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IPG vs TJI Fund Comparison
MetricIPGTJICategory median
Daily−1.26%−2.24%−1.33%
1 week−0.88%−1.50%−0.68%
1 month−2.75%−6.50%−2.96%
3 months0.96%−3.20%0.00%
6 months5.50%−1.99%2.05%
YTD13.30%12.26%17.79%
1 year22.48%21.61%24.45%
3 years146.59%141.99%158.82%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IPG vs TJI Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IPG (İş Portföy Atak Fon Sepeti Fonu) and TJI (TEB Portföy İkinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, IPG leads in 9 and TJI leads in 2. IPG is a Fund of Funds fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TJI is a Fund of Funds fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IPG leads (−1.26% vs −2.24%). 1 week: IPG leads (−0.88% vs −1.50%). 1 month: IPG leads (−2.75% vs −6.50%). 3 months: IPG leads (0.96% vs −3.20%). 6 months: IPG leads (5.50% vs −1.99%). YTD: IPG leads (13.30% vs 12.26%). 1 year: IPG leads (22.48% vs 21.61%). 3 years: IPG leads (146.59% vs 141.99%). Size (TRY): TJI leads (397.1M vs 340.4M). Investors: IPG leads (1,553 vs 766). Risk: TJI leads (4 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IPG returned 13.30% and TJI returned 12.26%; over the last year IPG returned 22.48% and TJI returned 21.61%. Over the last month IPG returned −2.75% and TJI returned −6.50%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, IPG has a size of TRY 340.4M with 1,553 investors, while TJI has a size of TRY 397.1M with 766 investors. TJI leads in size and IPG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IPG is 5 out of 7 and that of TJI is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.