ILU vs TJT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ILU (İstanbul Portföy Onaltıncı Serbest Fon) and TJT (TEB Portföy Altıncı Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ILU | TJT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.08% | 0.47% | 0.16% |
| 1 week | 1.93% | 0.53% | 0.46% |
| 1 month | −2.72% | 2.47% | 1.10% |
| 3 months | −25.61% | 3.14% | 3.53% |
| 6 months | −9.59% | 8.45% | 8.53% |
| YTD | −18.53% | 12.97% | 16.18% |
| 1 year | 4.17% | 19.18% | 19.94% |
| 3 years | — | 123.07% | 103.56% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ILU vs TJT Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of ILU (İstanbul Portföy Onaltıncı Serbest Fon) and TJT (TEB Portföy Altıncı Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, ILU leads in 1 and TJT leads in 8. ILU is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TJT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: TJT leads (0.47% vs 0.08%). 1 week: ILU leads (1.93% vs 0.53%). 1 month: TJT leads (2.47% vs −2.72%). 3 months: TJT leads (3.14% vs −25.61%). 6 months: TJT leads (8.45% vs −9.59%). YTD: TJT leads (12.97% vs −18.53%). 1 year: TJT leads (19.18% vs 4.17%). Size (TRY): TJT leads (2B vs 1.8B). Investors: TJT leads (1,648 vs 2).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, ILU or TJT?
Year to date ILU returned −18.53% and TJT returned 12.97%; over the last year ILU returned 4.17% and TJT returned 19.18%. Over the last month ILU returned −2.72% and TJT returned 2.47%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, ILU or TJT?
As of November 2, 2026, ILU has a size of TRY 1.8B with 2 investors, while TJT has a size of TRY 2B with 1,648 investors. TJT leads in size and TJT leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of ILU and TJT mean?
The CMB risk score of ILU is 6 out of 7 and that of TJT is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.