Yatırımcı.AI

IFV vs RBF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IFV (TEB Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları (TL) Fonu) and RBF (Rota Portföy Birinci Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) side by side.

IFVRBF
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IFV vs RBF Fund Comparison
MetricIFVRBFCategory median
Daily0.29%0.27%0.27%
1 week0.70%0.50%0.60%
1 month2.93%2.97%2.84%
3 months9.32%9.25%9.11%
6 months20.13%15.49%18.32%
YTD35.83%18.61%26.14%
1 year44.01%29.50%37.81%
3 years236.01%18.54%176.49%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IFV vs RBF Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IFV (TEB Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları (TL) Fonu) and RBF (Rota Portföy Birinci Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, IFV leads in 10 and RBF leads in 1. IFV is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RBF is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IFV leads (0.29% vs 0.27%). 1 week: IFV leads (0.70% vs 0.50%). 1 month: RBF leads (2.97% vs 2.93%). 3 months: IFV leads (9.32% vs 9.25%). 6 months: IFV leads (20.13% vs 15.49%). YTD: IFV leads (35.83% vs 18.61%). 1 year: IFV leads (44.01% vs 29.50%). 3 years: IFV leads (236.01% vs 18.54%). Size (TRY): IFV leads (29.5M vs 10.6M). Investors: IFV leads (197 vs 54). Risk: IFV leads (2 vs 3).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IFV returned 35.83% and RBF returned 18.61%; over the last year IFV returned 44.01% and RBF returned 29.50%. Over the last month IFV returned 2.93% and RBF returned 2.97%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, IFV has a size of TRY 29.5M with 197 investors, while RBF has a size of TRY 10.6M with 54 investors. IFV leads in size and IFV leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IFV is 2 out of 7 and that of RBF is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.