Yatırımcı.AI

IFN vs IHA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IFN (TEB Portföy Sürdürülebilirlik Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and IHA (Allbatross Portföy İkinci Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.

IFNIHA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IFN vs IHA Fund Comparison
MetricIFNIHACategory median
Today (est.)2.08%1.95%1.60%
Daily−2.85%−2.41%−3.03%
1 week−4.11%−3.06%−3.00%
1 month−11.11%−19.87%−11.63%
3 months−14.79%−23.88%−13.94%
6 months−18.15%−25.78%−14.98%
YTD−1.70%−9.60%2.54%
1 year−1.87%−7.70%4.18%
3 years63.36%57.48%79.59%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Nov 2, 2026, 17:26.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IFN vs IHA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IFN (TEB Portföy Sürdürülebilirlik Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and IHA (Allbatross Portföy İkinci Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, IFN leads in 9 and IHA leads in 2. IFN is a Stock Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IHA is a Stock Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi Anonim Şirketi.

Highlights: Today (est.): IFN leads (2.08% vs 1.95%). Daily: IHA leads (−2.41% vs −2.85%). 1 week: IHA leads (−3.06% vs −4.11%). 1 month: IFN leads (−11.11% vs −19.87%). 3 months: IFN leads (−14.79% vs −23.88%). 6 months: IFN leads (−18.15% vs −25.78%). YTD: IFN leads (−1.70% vs −9.60%). 1 year: IFN leads (−1.87% vs −7.70%). 3 years: IFN leads (63.36% vs 57.48%). Size (TRY): IFN leads (3.1M vs 1.9M). Investors: IFN leads (380 vs 240).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IFN returned −1.70% and IHA returned −9.60%; over the last year IFN returned −1.87% and IHA returned −7.70%. Over the last month IFN returned −11.11% and IHA returned −19.87%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, IFN has a size of TRY 3.1M with 380 investors, while IHA has a size of TRY 1.9M with 240 investors. IFN leads in size and IFN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IFN is 6 out of 7 and that of IHA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.