Yatırımcı.AI

HBN vs OLE Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of HBN (HSBC Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and OLE (Osmanlı Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

HBNOLE
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

HBN vs OLE Fund Comparison
MetricHBNOLECategory median
Daily−1.07%0.29%−1.33%
1 week−0.40%0.66%−0.68%
1 month−1.76%3.05%−2.96%
3 months2.19%9.70%0.00%
6 months6.45%21.65%2.05%
YTD21.00%38.49%17.79%
1 year24.51%47.26%24.45%
3 years151.78%255.85%158.82%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the HBN vs OLE Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of HBN (HSBC Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and OLE (Osmanlı Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, HBN leads in 2 and OLE leads in 8. HBN is a Fund of Funds fund managed by HSBC Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; OLE is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Osmanlı Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: OLE leads (0.29% vs −1.07%). 1 week: OLE leads (0.66% vs −0.40%). 1 month: OLE leads (3.05% vs −1.76%). 3 months: OLE leads (9.70% vs 2.19%). 6 months: OLE leads (21.65% vs 6.45%). YTD: OLE leads (38.49% vs 21.00%). 1 year: OLE leads (47.26% vs 24.51%). 3 years: OLE leads (255.85% vs 151.78%). Size (TRY): HBN leads (480.3M vs 417.7M). Investors: HBN leads (956 vs 447).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date HBN returned 21.00% and OLE returned 38.49%; over the last year HBN returned 24.51% and OLE returned 47.26%. Over the last month HBN returned −1.76% and OLE returned 3.05%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, HBN has a size of TRY 480.3M with 956 investors, while OLE has a size of TRY 417.7M with 447 investors. HBN leads in size and HBN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of HBN is — out of 7 and that of OLE is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.