GBG vs HMS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GBG (Inveo Portföy G-20 Ülkeleri Yabancı Hisse Senedi Fonu) and HMS (HSBC Portföy Sürdürülebilirlik Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GBG | HMS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | 2.00% | 1.10% |
| Daily | −1.61% | −3.00% | −3.03% |
| 1 week | 1.00% | −2.98% | −3.00% |
| 1 month | −3.32% | −10.16% | −11.63% |
| 3 months | 1.87% | −13.01% | −13.94% |
| 6 months | 15.01% | −22.55% | −14.98% |
| YTD | 42.38% | −3.33% | 2.54% |
| 1 year | 47.91% | −2.48% | 4.18% |
| 3 years | 186.58% | 74.08% | 79.59% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GBG vs HMS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GBG (Inveo Portföy G-20 Ülkeleri Yabancı Hisse Senedi Fonu) and HMS (HSBC Portföy Sürdürülebilirlik Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GBG leads in 9 and HMS leads in 1. GBG is a Stock Fund fund managed by Inveo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; HMS is a Stock Fund fund managed by HSBC Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GBG leads (−1.61% vs −3.00%). 1 week: GBG leads (1.00% vs −2.98%). 1 month: GBG leads (−3.32% vs −10.16%). 3 months: GBG leads (1.87% vs −13.01%). 6 months: GBG leads (15.01% vs −22.55%). YTD: GBG leads (42.38% vs −3.33%). 1 year: GBG leads (47.91% vs −2.48%). 3 years: GBG leads (186.58% vs 74.08%). Size (TRY): GBG leads (156.7M vs 155M). Investors: HMS leads (3,649 vs 3,369).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GBG or HMS?
Year to date GBG returned 42.38% and HMS returned −3.33%; over the last year GBG returned 47.91% and HMS returned −2.48%. Over the last month GBG returned −3.32% and HMS returned −10.16%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GBG or HMS?
As of November 2, 2026, GBG has a size of TRY 156.7M with 3,369 investors, while HMS has a size of TRY 155M with 3,649 investors. GBG leads in size and HMS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GBG and HMS mean?
The CMB risk score of GBG is 6 out of 7 and that of HMS is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.