Yatırımcı.AI

FZJ vs ILZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FZJ (Fiba Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and ILZ (İş Portföy Temkinli Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

FZJILZ
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FZJ vs ILZ Fund Comparison
MetricFZJILZCategory median
Daily−0.99%−0.12%−1.33%
1 week−0.70%0.24%−0.68%
1 month−2.47%0.52%−2.96%
3 months2.17%6.19%0.00%
6 months7.52%13.16%2.05%
YTD19.54%19.37%17.79%
1 year26.18%32.91%24.45%
3 years167.17%214.87%158.82%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FZJ vs ILZ Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FZJ (Fiba Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and ILZ (İş Portföy Temkinli Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FZJ leads in 1 and ILZ leads in 10. FZJ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ILZ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ILZ leads (−0.12% vs −0.99%). 1 week: ILZ leads (0.24% vs −0.70%). 1 month: ILZ leads (0.52% vs −2.47%). 3 months: ILZ leads (6.19% vs 2.17%). 6 months: ILZ leads (13.16% vs 7.52%). YTD: FZJ leads (19.54% vs 19.37%). 1 year: ILZ leads (32.91% vs 26.18%). 3 years: ILZ leads (214.87% vs 167.17%). Size (TRY): ILZ leads (1.1B vs 1B). Investors: ILZ leads (5,894 vs 1,927). Risk: ILZ leads (2 vs 4).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FZJ returned 19.54% and ILZ returned 19.37%; over the last year FZJ returned 26.18% and ILZ returned 32.91%. Over the last month FZJ returned −2.47% and ILZ returned 0.52%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, FZJ has a size of TRY 1B with 1,927 investors, while ILZ has a size of TRY 1.1B with 5,894 investors. ILZ leads in size and ILZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FZJ is 4 out of 7 and that of ILZ is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.