Yatırımcı.AI

FFH vs PPG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FFH (QNB Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and PPG (Albaraka Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) side by side.

FFHPPG
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FFH vs PPG Fund Comparison
MetricFFHPPGCategory median
Daily−0.84%0.28%−0.18%
1 week−0.28%0.66%0.13%
1 month−1.10%3.00%−0.64%
3 months4.99%9.26%3.73%
6 months10.89%20.67%9.17%
YTD29.58%36.05%26.58%
1 year38.91%44.31%30.98%
3 years191.81%—166.05%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FFH vs PPG Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FFH (QNB Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and PPG (Albaraka Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FFH leads in 1 and PPG leads in 9. FFH is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPG is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Albaraka Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PPG leads (0.28% vs −0.84%). 1 week: PPG leads (0.66% vs −0.28%). 1 month: PPG leads (3.00% vs −1.10%). 3 months: PPG leads (9.26% vs 4.99%). 6 months: PPG leads (20.67% vs 10.89%). YTD: PPG leads (36.05% vs 29.58%). 1 year: PPG leads (44.31% vs 38.91%). Size (TRY): PPG leads (1.7B vs 1.5B). Investors: FFH leads (1,911 vs 1,736). Risk: PPG leads (1 vs 4).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FFH returned 29.58% and PPG returned 36.05%; over the last year FFH returned 38.91% and PPG returned 44.31%. Over the last month FFH returned −1.10% and PPG returned 3.00%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, FFH has a size of TRY 1.5B with 1,911 investors, while PPG has a size of TRY 1.7B with 1,736 investors. PPG leads in size and FFH leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FFH is 4 out of 7 and that of PPG is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.