Yatırımcı.AI

DPB vs NVT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DPB (Deniz Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NVT (Neo Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

DPBNVT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

DPB vs NVT Fund Comparison
MetricDPBNVTCategory median
Daily0.20%0.26%0.16%
1 week0.51%0.65%0.46%
1 month2.57%2.80%1.10%
3 months5.64%9.15%3.53%
6 months10.63%20.16%8.53%
YTD17.33%34.74%16.18%
1 year23.58%43.09%19.94%
3 years163.15%252.32%103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the DPB vs NVT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DPB (Deniz Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NVT (Neo Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, DPB leads in 1 and NVT leads in 10. DPB is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NVT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NVT leads (0.26% vs 0.20%). 1 week: NVT leads (0.65% vs 0.51%). 1 month: NVT leads (2.80% vs 2.57%). 3 months: NVT leads (9.15% vs 5.64%). 6 months: NVT leads (20.16% vs 10.63%). YTD: NVT leads (34.74% vs 17.33%). 1 year: NVT leads (43.09% vs 23.58%). 3 years: NVT leads (252.32% vs 163.15%). Size (TRY): NVT leads (7.2B vs 7.2B). Investors: DPB leads (2,402 vs 88). Risk: NVT leads (3 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date DPB returned 17.33% and NVT returned 34.74%; over the last year DPB returned 23.58% and NVT returned 43.09%. Over the last month DPB returned 2.57% and NVT returned 2.80%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, DPB has a size of TRY 7.2B with 2,402 investors, while NVT has a size of TRY 7.2B with 88 investors. NVT leads in size and DPB leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DPB is 6 out of 7 and that of NVT is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.