Yatırımcı.AI

DFD vs RPS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DFD (Deniz Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) and RPS (Rota Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

DFDRPS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

DFD vs RPS Fund Comparison
MetricDFDRPSCategory median
Daily−1.20%0.13%0.16%
1 week−0.97%0.41%0.46%
1 month−2.97%2.27%1.10%
3 months2.21%4.46%3.53%
6 months0.06%9.14%8.53%
YTD18.37%16.48%16.18%
1 year25.27%20.73%19.94%
3 years97.12%109.18%103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the DFD vs RPS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DFD (Deniz Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) and RPS (Rota Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DFD leads in 4 and RPS leads in 6. DFD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RPS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RPS leads (0.13% vs −1.20%). 1 week: RPS leads (0.41% vs −0.97%). 1 month: RPS leads (2.27% vs −2.97%). 3 months: RPS leads (4.46% vs 2.21%). 6 months: RPS leads (9.14% vs 0.06%). YTD: DFD leads (18.37% vs 16.48%). 1 year: DFD leads (25.27% vs 20.73%). 3 years: RPS leads (109.18% vs 97.12%). Size (TRY): DFD leads (129.8M vs 127.8M). Investors: DFD leads (374 vs 66).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date DFD returned 18.37% and RPS returned 16.48%; over the last year DFD returned 25.27% and RPS returned 20.73%. Over the last month DFD returned −2.97% and RPS returned 2.27%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, DFD has a size of TRY 129.8M with 374 investors, while RPS has a size of TRY 127.8M with 66 investors. DFD leads in size and DFD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DFD is 6 out of 7 and that of RPS is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.