CHK vs GUV Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CHK (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GUV (Garanti Portföy Uzun Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CHK | GUV | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.27% |
| 1 week | 0.37% | 0.47% | 0.60% |
| 1 month | 2.70% | 2.66% | 2.84% |
| 3 months | 9.08% | 8.55% | 9.11% |
| 6 months | 14.72% | 14.90% | 18.32% |
| YTD | 22.30% | 13.34% | 26.14% |
| 1 year | 34.79% | 25.75% | 37.81% |
| 3 years | 168.39% | 15.55% | 176.49% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CHK vs GUV Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of CHK (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GUV (Garanti Portföy Uzun Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, CHK leads in 7 and GUV leads in 4. CHK is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; GUV is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GUV leads (0.25% vs 0.19%). 1 week: GUV leads (0.47% vs 0.37%). 1 month: CHK leads (2.70% vs 2.66%). 3 months: CHK leads (9.08% vs 8.55%). 6 months: GUV leads (14.90% vs 14.72%). YTD: CHK leads (22.30% vs 13.34%). 1 year: CHK leads (34.79% vs 25.75%). 3 years: CHK leads (168.39% vs 15.55%). Size (TRY): GUV leads (740.2M vs 726.7M). Investors: CHK leads (28,036 vs 1,638). Risk: CHK leads (3 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, CHK or GUV?
Year to date CHK returned 22.30% and GUV returned 13.34%; over the last year CHK returned 34.79% and GUV returned 25.75%. Over the last month CHK returned 2.70% and GUV returned 2.66%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, CHK or GUV?
As of November 2, 2026, CHK has a size of TRY 726.7M with 28,036 investors, while GUV has a size of TRY 740.2M with 1,638 investors. GUV leads in size and CHK leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of CHK and GUV mean?
The CMB risk score of CHK is 3 out of 7 and that of GUV is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.