CHG vs KET Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CHG (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresif Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and KET (Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CHG | KET | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −3.27% | −1.83% | −1.41% |
| 1 week | −3.11% | −1.43% | −0.69% |
| 1 month | −9.38% | −5.01% | −3.96% |
| 3 months | −6.18% | −0.67% | −1.43% |
| 6 months | −11.59% | 4.60% | 1.85% |
| YTD | 3.77% | 31.11% | 17.97% |
| 1 year | 8.11% | 36.58% | 23.69% |
| 3 years | 104.58% | 185.21% | 149.99% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CHG vs KET Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of CHG (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresif Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and KET (Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, CHG leads in 0 and KET leads in 11. CHG is a Variable Fund fund managed by QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; KET is a Variable Fund fund managed by Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: KET leads (−1.83% vs −3.27%). 1 week: KET leads (−1.43% vs −3.11%). 1 month: KET leads (−5.01% vs −9.38%). 3 months: KET leads (−0.67% vs −6.18%). 6 months: KET leads (4.60% vs −11.59%). YTD: KET leads (31.11% vs 3.77%). 1 year: KET leads (36.58% vs 8.11%). 3 years: KET leads (185.21% vs 104.58%). Size (TRY): KET leads (248.2M vs 239.7M). Investors: KET leads (2,760 vs 335). Risk: KET leads (4 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, CHG or KET?
Year to date CHG returned 3.77% and KET returned 31.11%; over the last year CHG returned 8.11% and KET returned 36.58%. Over the last month CHG returned −9.38% and KET returned −5.01%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, CHG or KET?
As of November 2, 2026, CHG has a size of TRY 239.7M with 335 investors, while KET has a size of TRY 248.2M with 2,760 investors. KET leads in size and KET leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of CHG and KET mean?
The CMB risk score of CHG is 6 out of 7 and that of KET is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.