CFD vs GHG Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CFD (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Dış Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GHG (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Dış Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CFD | GHG | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.23% | 0.41% | 0.41% |
| 1 week | 0.67% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
| 1 month | 3.44% | 3.77% | 3.79% |
| 3 months | 4.77% | 4.77% | 4.78% |
| 6 months | 9.50% | 11.13% | 11.22% |
| YTD | 14.84% | 16.47% | 16.41% |
| 1 year | 23.07% | 21.97% | 22.21% |
| 3 years | 132.12% | 132.94% | 132.53% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CFD vs GHG Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of CFD (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Dış Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GHG (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Dış Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, CFD leads in 2 and GHG leads in 9. CFD is a External Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; GHG is a External Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GHG leads (0.41% vs 0.23%). 1 week: GHG leads (0.81% vs 0.67%). 1 month: GHG leads (3.77% vs 3.44%). 3 months: CFD leads (4.77% vs 4.77%). 6 months: GHG leads (11.13% vs 9.50%). YTD: GHG leads (16.47% vs 14.84%). 1 year: CFD leads (23.07% vs 21.97%). 3 years: GHG leads (132.94% vs 132.12%). Size (TRY): GHG leads (5.9B vs 204.9M). Investors: GHG leads (57,417 vs 1,029). Risk: GHG leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, CFD or GHG?
Year to date CFD returned 14.84% and GHG returned 16.47%; over the last year CFD returned 23.07% and GHG returned 21.97%. Over the last month CFD returned 3.44% and GHG returned 3.77%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, CFD or GHG?
As of November 2, 2026, CFD has a size of TRY 204.9M with 1,029 investors, while GHG has a size of TRY 5.9B with 57,417 investors. GHG leads in size and GHG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of CFD and GHG mean?
The CMB risk score of CFD is 6 out of 7 and that of GHG is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.