BSM vs PDF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BSM (Global MD Portföy Berrak Serbest Fon) and PDF (Astra Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BSM | Category median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.38% | 0.24% | 0.16% |
| 1 week | 0.97% | 0.55% | 0.46% |
| 1 month | 3.04% | 2.54% | 1.10% |
| 3 months | 12.84% | 5.20% | 3.53% |
| 6 months | 30.44% | 12.12% | 8.53% |
| YTD | 66.86% | 18.09% | 16.18% |
| 1 year | 88.67% | 22.63% | 19.94% |
| 3 years | — | 105.63% | 103.56% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BSM vs PDF Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BSM (Global MD Portföy Berrak Serbest Fon) and PDF (Astra Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BSM leads in 8 and PDF leads in 2. BSM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Global MD Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PDF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QInvest Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: BSM leads (0.38% vs 0.24%). 1 week: BSM leads (0.97% vs 0.55%). 1 month: BSM leads (3.04% vs 2.54%). 3 months: BSM leads (12.84% vs 5.20%). 6 months: BSM leads (30.44% vs 12.12%). YTD: BSM leads (66.86% vs 18.09%). 1 year: BSM leads (88.67% vs 22.63%). Size (TRY): PDF leads (484.3M vs 469.7M). Investors: BSM leads (1,192 vs 42). Risk: PDF leads (5 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BSM or PDF?
Year to date BSM returned 66.86% and PDF returned 18.09%; over the last year BSM returned 88.67% and PDF returned 22.63%. Over the last month BSM returned 3.04% and PDF returned 2.54%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BSM or PDF?
As of November 2, 2026, BSM has a size of TRY 469.7M with 1,192 investors, while PDF has a size of TRY 484.3M with 42 investors. PDF leads in size and BSM leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BSM and PDF mean?
The CMB risk score of BSM is 7 out of 7 and that of PDF is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.