Yatırımcı.AI

BJD vs BVZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BJD (Azimut Portföy 13.0 Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and BVZ (BV Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) side by side.

BJDBVZ
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BJD vs BVZ Fund Comparison
MetricBJDBVZCategory median
Daily0.18%0.37%0.16%
1 week0.49%0.82%0.46%
1 month1.96%3.16%1.10%
3 months5.86%9.54%3.53%
6 months12.20%21.30%8.53%
YTD18.73%38.43%16.18%
1 year22.06%46.68%19.94%
3 years89.45%284.67%103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BJD vs BVZ Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BJD (Azimut Portföy 13.0 Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and BVZ (BV Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BJD leads in 0 and BVZ leads in 10. BJD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; BVZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by BV Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BVZ leads (0.37% vs 0.18%). 1 week: BVZ leads (0.82% vs 0.49%). 1 month: BVZ leads (3.16% vs 1.96%). 3 months: BVZ leads (9.54% vs 5.86%). 6 months: BVZ leads (21.30% vs 12.20%). YTD: BVZ leads (38.43% vs 18.73%). 1 year: BVZ leads (46.68% vs 22.06%). 3 years: BVZ leads (284.67% vs 89.45%). Size (TRY): BVZ leads (943.7M vs 933.5M). Investors: BVZ leads (376 vs 101).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BJD returned 18.73% and BVZ returned 38.43%; over the last year BJD returned 22.06% and BVZ returned 46.68%. Over the last month BJD returned 1.96% and BVZ returned 3.16%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, BJD has a size of TRY 933.5M with 101 investors, while BVZ has a size of TRY 943.7M with 376 investors. BVZ leads in size and BVZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BJD is — out of 7 and that of BVZ is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.