Yatırımcı.AI

BIO vs RHS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BIO (İş Portföy Sürdürülebilirlik Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and RHS (Rota Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.

BIORHS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BIO vs RHS Fund Comparison
MetricBIORHSCategory median
Today (est.)1.85%1.26%1.15%
Daily−2.61%−2.68%−3.03%
1 week−3.23%−1.98%−3.00%
1 month−11.50%−9.05%−11.63%
3 months−16.64%−11.62%−13.94%
6 months−19.98%−13.31%−14.98%
YTD−5.29%7.24%2.54%
1 year−2.93%14.66%4.18%
3 years96.74%103.55%79.59%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Nov 2, 2026, 16:28.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BIO vs RHS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BIO (İş Portföy Sürdürülebilirlik Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and RHS (Rota Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BIO leads in 3 and RHS leads in 8. BIO is a Stock Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RHS is a Stock Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Today (est.): BIO leads (1.85% vs 1.26%). Daily: BIO leads (−2.61% vs −2.68%). 1 week: RHS leads (−1.98% vs −3.23%). 1 month: RHS leads (−9.05% vs −11.50%). 3 months: RHS leads (−11.62% vs −16.64%). 6 months: RHS leads (−13.31% vs −19.98%). YTD: RHS leads (7.24% vs −5.29%). 1 year: RHS leads (14.66% vs −2.93%). 3 years: RHS leads (103.55% vs 96.74%). Size (TRY): RHS leads (579.3M vs 561.8M). Investors: BIO leads (8,843 vs 1,170).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BIO returned −5.29% and RHS returned 7.24%; over the last year BIO returned −2.93% and RHS returned 14.66%. Over the last month BIO returned −11.50% and RHS returned −9.05%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, BIO has a size of TRY 561.8M with 8,843 investors, while RHS has a size of TRY 579.3M with 1,170 investors. RHS leads in size and BIO leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BIO is 6 out of 7 and that of RHS is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.