Yatırımcı.AI

BEK vs CFC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BEK (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Fiba Portföy Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and CFC (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Orta Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

BEKCFC
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BEK vs CFC Fund Comparison
MetricBEKCFCCategory median
Daily0.10%0.20%0.27%
1 week0.32%0.42%0.60%
1 month1.77%2.88%2.84%
3 months7.19%9.77%9.11%
6 months14.62%15.74%18.32%
YTD19.43%24.06%26.14%
1 year29.36%36.36%37.81%
3 years146.11%188.20%176.49%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BEK vs CFC Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BEK (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Fiba Portföy Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and CFC (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Orta Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BEK leads in 2 and CFC leads in 9. BEK is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; CFC is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: CFC leads (0.20% vs 0.10%). 1 week: CFC leads (0.42% vs 0.32%). 1 month: CFC leads (2.88% vs 1.77%). 3 months: CFC leads (9.77% vs 7.19%). 6 months: CFC leads (15.74% vs 14.62%). YTD: CFC leads (24.06% vs 19.43%). 1 year: CFC leads (36.36% vs 29.36%). 3 years: CFC leads (188.20% vs 146.11%). Size (TRY): BEK leads (572.3M vs 80.6M). Investors: BEK leads (34,365 vs 327). Risk: CFC leads (3 vs 4).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BEK returned 19.43% and CFC returned 24.06%; over the last year BEK returned 29.36% and CFC returned 36.36%. Over the last month BEK returned 1.77% and CFC returned 2.88%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, BEK has a size of TRY 572.3M with 34,365 investors, while CFC has a size of TRY 80.6M with 327 investors. BEK leads in size and BEK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BEK is 4 out of 7 and that of CFC is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.