Yatırımcı.AI

ALS vs GEU Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ALS (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. İkinci Karma Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GEU (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

ALSGEU
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ALS vs GEU Fund Comparison
MetricALSGEUCategory median
Daily−0.09%0.20%−1.41%
1 week0.80%0.59%−0.69%
1 month−0.44%2.61%−3.96%
3 months2.51%6.73%−1.43%
6 months3.95%14.31%1.85%
YTD17.13%23.73%17.97%
1 year22.37%28.51%23.69%
3 years138.10%134.91%149.99%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ALS vs GEU Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ALS (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. İkinci Karma Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GEU (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ALS leads in 4 and GEU leads in 6. ALS is a Variable Fund fund managed by Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; GEU is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GEU leads (0.20% vs −0.09%). 1 week: ALS leads (0.80% vs 0.59%). 1 month: GEU leads (2.61% vs −0.44%). 3 months: GEU leads (6.73% vs 2.51%). 6 months: GEU leads (14.31% vs 3.95%). YTD: GEU leads (23.73% vs 17.13%). 1 year: GEU leads (28.51% vs 22.37%). 3 years: ALS leads (138.10% vs 134.91%). Size (TRY): ALS leads (6.2B vs 5.5B). Investors: ALS leads (157,658 vs 32,723).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ALS returned 17.13% and GEU returned 23.73%; over the last year ALS returned 22.37% and GEU returned 28.51%. Over the last month ALS returned −0.44% and GEU returned 2.61%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, ALS has a size of TRY 6.2B with 157,658 investors, while GEU has a size of TRY 5.5B with 32,723 investors. ALS leads in size and ALS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ALS is 5 out of 7 and that of GEU is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.