AJP vs MHU Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AJP (AXA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Atak Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHU (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | AJP | MHU | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −2.41% | −2.26% | −1.41% |
| 1 week | −2.16% | −1.92% | −0.69% |
| 1 month | −7.48% | −8.16% | −3.96% |
| 3 months | −3.60% | −6.14% | −1.43% |
| 6 months | −7.50% | −4.23% | 1.85% |
| YTD | 16.25% | 16.55% | 17.97% |
| 1 year | 20.07% | 18.83% | 23.69% |
| 3 years | 148.77% | 148.03% | 149.99% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the AJP vs MHU Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of AJP (AXA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Atak Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHU (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AJP leads in 4 and MHU leads in 6. AJP is a Variable Fund fund managed by AXA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; MHU is a Variable Fund fund managed by MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MHU leads (−2.26% vs −2.41%). 1 week: MHU leads (−1.92% vs −2.16%). 1 month: AJP leads (−7.48% vs −8.16%). 3 months: AJP leads (−3.60% vs −6.14%). 6 months: MHU leads (−4.23% vs −7.50%). YTD: MHU leads (16.55% vs 16.25%). 1 year: AJP leads (20.07% vs 18.83%). 3 years: AJP leads (148.77% vs 148.03%). Size (TRY): MHU leads (30.4M vs 28.9M). Investors: MHU leads (487 vs 430).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, AJP or MHU?
Year to date AJP returned 16.25% and MHU returned 16.55%; over the last year AJP returned 20.07% and MHU returned 18.83%. Over the last month AJP returned −7.48% and MHU returned −8.16%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, AJP or MHU?
As of November 2, 2026, AJP has a size of TRY 28.9M with 430 investors, while MHU has a size of TRY 30.4M with 487 investors. MHU leads in size and MHU leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of AJP and MHU mean?
The CMB risk score of AJP is 5 out of 7 and that of MHU is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.