Yatırımcı.AI

AFA vs TMG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AFA (Ak Portföy Amerika Yabancı Hisse Senedi Fonu) and TMG (İş Portföy Yabancı Hisse Senedi Fonu) side by side.

AFATMG
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

AFA vs TMG Fund Comparison
MetricAFATMGCategory median
Daily−1.45%−1.98%−3.03%
1 week−0.31%−0.41%−3.00%
1 month−0.56%−0.16%−11.63%
3 months7.03%5.89%−13.94%
6 months19.10%17.09%−14.98%
YTD28.48%26.93%2.54%
1 year34.96%30.21%4.18%
3 years218.91%224.70%79.59%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the AFA vs TMG Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AFA (Ak Portföy Amerika Yabancı Hisse Senedi Fonu) and TMG (İş Portföy Yabancı Hisse Senedi Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AFA leads in 7 and TMG leads in 3. AFA is a Stock Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TMG is a Stock Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: AFA leads (−1.45% vs −1.98%). 1 week: AFA leads (−0.31% vs −0.41%). 1 month: TMG leads (−0.16% vs −0.56%). 3 months: AFA leads (7.03% vs 5.89%). 6 months: AFA leads (19.10% vs 17.09%). YTD: AFA leads (28.48% vs 26.93%). 1 year: AFA leads (34.96% vs 30.21%). 3 years: TMG leads (224.70% vs 218.91%). Size (TRY): TMG leads (5B vs 4.7B). Investors: AFA leads (44,540 vs 33,723).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date AFA returned 28.48% and TMG returned 26.93%; over the last year AFA returned 34.96% and TMG returned 30.21%. Over the last month AFA returned −0.56% and TMG returned −0.16%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, AFA has a size of TRY 4.7B with 44,540 investors, while TMG has a size of TRY 5B with 33,723 investors. TMG leads in size and AFA leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AFA is 6 out of 7 and that of TMG is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.