TRILC vs TUPRS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of TRILC and TUPRS side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | TRILC | TUPRS | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 0.70 | 337.00 | 10.81 |
| Daily change | −1.41% | −1.89% | 0.30% |
| Market cap | TRY 725.9M | TRY 649.3B | TRY 2.9B |
| P/E | — | 9.10 | 11.70 |
| P/B | 0.51 | 1.45 | 0.79 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.78% | 1.06% |
| Return on equity | −41.13% | 18.20% | 1.14% |
| Free float | 73.20% | 49.04% | 36.14% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the TRILC vs TUPRS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of TRILC (Türk İlaç Serum) and TUPRS (Tüpraş) side by side as of Nov 2, 2026, 14:00. Of the 15 metrics compared, TRILC leads in 5 and TUPRS leads in 10.
Highlights: Daily change: TRILC leads (−1.41% vs −1.89%). Market cap: TUPRS leads (TRY 649.3B vs TRY 725.9M). P/B: TRILC leads (0.51 vs 1.45). EV/EBITDA: TRILC leads (3.90 vs 5.24). EV/Sales: TUPRS leads (0.80 vs 1.40). Gross margin: TRILC leads (32.92% vs 12.69%). EBITDA margin (annual): TRILC leads (27.78% vs 10.32%). Net margin (annual): TUPRS leads (7.07% vs −15.17%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is TRILC or TUPRS cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 9.10); by P/B, TRILC trades at the lower multiple (0.51 vs 1.45).
Which is more profitable, TRILC or TUPRS?
Annual net margin is −15.17% for TRILC and 7.07% for TUPRS; return on equity is −41.13% for TRILC and 18.20% for TUPRS.
Which is more leveraged, TRILC or TUPRS?
The leverage ratio is 83.21 for TRILC and 46.13 for TUPRS; net debt/EBITDA is 3.34 for TRILC and −1.23 for TUPRS. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.