CRDFA vs QNBFK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of CRDFA and QNBFK side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CRDFA | QNBFK | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 9.05 | 36.38 | 8.72 |
| Daily change | −9.95% | 8.27% | 0.21% |
| Market cap | TRY 2.7B | TRY 91B | TRY 6.8B |
| P/E | — | 36.85 | 2.64 |
| P/B | 26.69 | 9.45 | 0.76 |
| Return on equity | −2.45% | 29.71% | 29.35% |
| Free float | 51.61% | 0.60% | 28.23% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CRDFA vs QNBFK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of CRDFA (Creditwest Faktoring) and QNBFK (QNB Finansal Kiralama) side by side as of Nov 2, 2026, 17:07. Of the 6 metrics compared, CRDFA leads in 0 and QNBFK leads in 6.
Highlights: Daily change: QNBFK leads (8.27% vs −9.95%). Market cap: QNBFK leads (TRY 91B vs TRY 2.7B). P/B: QNBFK leads (9.45 vs 26.69). Net margin (annual): QNBFK leads (202.97% vs −4.51%). Return on assets: QNBFK leads (3.56% vs −0.96%). Return on equity: QNBFK leads (29.71% vs −2.45%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CRDFA or QNBFK cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 36.85); by P/B, QNBFK trades at the lower multiple (26.69 vs 9.45).
Which is more profitable, CRDFA or QNBFK?
Annual net margin is −4.51% for CRDFA and 202.97% for QNBFK; return on equity is −2.45% for CRDFA and 29.71% for QNBFK.
Which is more leveraged, CRDFA or QNBFK?
The leverage ratio is — for CRDFA and — for QNBFK; net debt/EBITDA is — for CRDFA and — for QNBFK. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.