CITAS vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of CITAS and KENT side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CITAS | KENT | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 87.05 | 240.30 | 8.79 |
| Daily change | −1.64% | 0.13% | −0.77% |
| Market cap | TRY 15.7B | TRY 79.3B | TRY 2.7B |
| P/E | 11.73 | — | 11.11 |
| P/B | 2.05 | 9.51 | 0.68 |
| Return on equity | 21.19% | −7.52% | −1.60% |
| Free float | 14.87% | 0.54% | 31.43% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CITAS vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of CITAS (Citlekci Magazacilik Gida) and KENT (Kent Gida) side by side as of Nov 2, 2026, 15:30. Of the 14 metrics compared, CITAS leads in 9 and KENT leads in 5.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (0.13% vs −1.64%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 79.3B vs TRY 15.7B). P/B: CITAS leads (2.05 vs 9.51). EV/EBITDA: KENT leads (87.74 vs 287.89). EV/Sales: CITAS leads (1.82 vs 5.91). Gross margin: CITAS leads (32.64% vs 19.26%). EBITDA margin (annual): KENT leads (6.13% vs −97.56%). Net margin (annual): CITAS leads (121.20% vs −4.18%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CITAS or KENT cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (11.73 vs —); by P/B, CITAS trades at the lower multiple (2.05 vs 9.51).
Which is more profitable, CITAS or KENT?
Annual net margin is 121.20% for CITAS and −4.18% for KENT; return on equity is 21.19% for CITAS and −7.52% for KENT.
Which is more leveraged, CITAS or KENT?
The leverage ratio is 22.03 for CITAS and 41.20 for KENT; net debt/EBITDA is — for CITAS and −0.69 for KENT. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.